HOTEP-EL v. CARTER et al
Plaintiff: YUSUF HOTEP-EL
Defendant: ROBERT CARTER, HARTZELL, T. PHEGLEY and BRIAN SMITH
Case Number: 2:2020cv00390
Filed: July 29, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: James Patrick Hanlon
Referring Judge: Doris L Pryor
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 8, 2020 Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff YUSUF HOTEP-EL. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(JRB)
September 8, 2020 Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Truth by YUSUF HOTEP-EL. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JRB)
August 7, 2020 Filing 5 ENTRY DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SUPPLEMENT MOTION - The plaintiff shall have through September 4, 2020, to supplement his motion by filing a copy of his trust fund account statement for the period of June 24, 2020 to July 29, 2020. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 8/7/2020.(KAA)
July 30, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy distributed to Plaintiff via US mail. (TMC)
July 29, 2020 Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH)
July 29, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff YUSUF HOTEP-EL. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Offender Trust System Transaction History Inquiry, #2 Envelope)(AKH) Modified on 7/29/2020 (AKH). (Attachment 2 replaced on 7/29/2020) (AKH).
July 29, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ROBERT CARTER, HARTZELL, T. PHEGLEY, BRIAN SMITH, filed by YUSUF HOTEP-EL. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope). (AKH) Modified on 7/29/2020 (AKH). (Attachment 1 replaced on 7/29/2020) (AKH).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HOTEP-EL v. CARTER et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: YUSUF HOTEP-EL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ROBERT CARTER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HARTZELL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T. PHEGLEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BRIAN SMITH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?