Cases 1 - 10 of 291
TAYLOR v. PLATT et al
as 2:2024cv00314
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BRETT TAYLOR
Defendant:
DAVID PLATT, OJO, EMMERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRADY v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00985
Plaintiff:
JULIAN DEVELL GRADY
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, TRICIA PRETORIUS, KEITH HARTZELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hartzell v. Insight Global LLC
as 2:2024cv00633
Plaintiff:
John Hartzell
Defendant:
Insight Global, LLC
CLARK v. PLATT et al
as 1:2024cv00710
Plaintiff:
GREGORY T. CLARK, II
Defendant:
CHAD PLATT, KEITH HARTZELL, PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
FORGEY v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00610
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HERBERT FORGEY
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, TRICIA PRETORIUS, EMERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hartzell v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv03034
Petitioner:
Timothy J. Hartzell, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
KIM v. MOBILIA et al
as 1:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
SARA KIM
Defendant:
NICHOLAS C. MOBILIA, MICHELE S. HARTZELL and NORTH EAST SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
MIDDLETON v. EMERSON et al
as 1:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
JASON MICHAEL MIDDLETON
Defendant:
EMERSON, AUSTIN, HARTZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
