MARTIN v. CLARKE et al
| ANTHONY MARTIN |
| SARAH CLARKE, MARY BETH RUTH-SIMS, SARAH BEDWELL, BOBBI RIGGS, SCOTT, AVERYHART, FAGG, FALLION, FRANK VANHEL, CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES OF INDIANA, KIM HUDSON, AMY WRIGHT and HAIL |
| 2:2023cv00282 |
| June 9, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
Order on In Forma Pauperis Status - The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #3 , is granted. Although the plaintiff is excused from pre-paying the full filing fee, he still must pay the three hundred and fifty dollar ($350.00) filing fee pursuant to the statutory formula set forth in 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2) when able. No initial partial filing fee is due at this time. (See Order.) Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 7/7/2023. (JSR)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (MEH) |
| Filing 5 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (RSF) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (RSF) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff ANTHONY MARTIN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(RSF) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against AVERYHART, SARAH BEDWELL, CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES OF INDIANA, SARAH CLARKE, FAGG, FALLION, HAIL, KIM HUDSON, BOBBI RIGGS, MARY BETH RUTH-SIMS, SCOTT, FRANK VANHEL, AMY WRIGHT, filed by ANTHONY MARTIN. (No fee paid with this filing) (RSF) |
| Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by ANTHONY MARTIN located at WVCF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by ANTHONY MARTIN to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (RSF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
