Cases 1 - 10 of 67
THOMPSON v. HOLCOMB et al
as 2:2024cv00539
Defendant:
ARNOLD, SMITH, HURSTEIN and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOWER v. EDWARDS et al
as 2:2024cv00511
Defendant:
LOWELL, YARBER, HEYSE and others
Plaintiff:
SASHA NIGHTSHADE and JUSTIN LOWER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. MHM HEALTH PROFESSIONALS, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
MHM HEALTH PROFESSIONALS, LLC, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, CRISTINA REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCRACKEN v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
RICHARD MCCRACKEN
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, CARLA COAKLEY, M. PAYNE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fagg v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 7:2023cv00120
Defendant:
Sanofi U.S. Services Inc., Sanofi-Aventis US Inc and Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
Plaintiff:
Virginia Fagg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MARTIN v. BEDWELL et al
as 2:2023cv00511
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
SARAH BEDWELL, BOBBI RIGGS, MARY BETH RUTH-SIMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. ACKERS et al
as 2:2023cv00384
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
ACKERS, ERIC HILL, DOWNING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FAGG v. USA
as 1:2023cv00469
Petitioner:
MICHAEL SCOTT FAGG
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
MARTIN v. CLARKE et al
as 2:2023cv00282
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
SARAH CLARKE, MARY BETH RUTH-SIMS, SARAH BEDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. HOLCOMB et al
as 2:2023cv00272
Plaintiff:
JOHN THOMPSON
Defendant:
C. HOLCOMB, KEYES, ASHBA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
