Dennis v. United States of America et al
| Benetta Dennis |
| United States of America, Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Jaddou, Marta Nickols, United States Citizenship and Immigration Service, United States Attorney General and United States Department of Homeland Security |
| 4:2022cv00022 |
| February 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Iowa |
| Helen C Adams |
| Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1447 Immigration: Review of Denial of Naturalization Application |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Set Deadlines/Hearings: Status Report due by 3/29/2022. (btg) |
| Filing 3 TEXT ORDER directing Plaintiff's counsel to file a status report update by 3/29/2022 regarding the status of service in this case. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Helen C. Adams on 3/22/2022. (jsa) |
| Filing 2 Summons: Counsel should download the attached summons in compliance with Rule 4 of the Rules of Civil Procedure for summons. (kjw) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Mandamus Filing fee paid in the amount of $ 402, receipt number 0863-4721135., filed by Benetta Dennis. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Initial Naturalization Decision, #2 Exhibit 2 - New N-400, #3 Exhibit 3 - New Interview Notice)(Bergmann, Benjamin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
