Soman Ramirez v. United States of America et al
| Soman Ramirez Norma and Norma Soman Ramirez |
| United States of America, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Jaddou, Marta Nickols, United States Attorney General and United States Department of Homeland Security |
| 4:2023cv00126 |
| April 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Iowa |
| William P Kelly |
| Stephen H Locher |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
TEXT ORDER accelerating response deadline to #1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed by Norma Soman Ramirez. Defendants shall file a response to the Petition on or before June 21, 2023. Signed by Judge Stephen H. Locher on May 31, 2023. (mm)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Jason Ray Lawrence on behalf of All Defendants (Lawrence, Jason) |
| Filing 2 Summons Note: Counsel should download the attached summons in compliance with Rule 4 of the Rules of Civil Procedure for summons. (btg) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Mandamus Temporary Injunctive Relief, and Request for Emergency Hearing Filing fee paid in the amount of $ 402, receipt number AIASDC-5119560., filed by Soman Ramirez Norma.(Bergmann, Benjamin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
