Woods et al v. Carvajal et al
| Preston Everette, Alexander Charles, Herman Williams, Sundiata El-Amin, Kevin Tyler, Anthony Rhodes, Troy Witschi, Jerome Woods, Salah Mohamed, Torell Hall, Tremaine Brown and Joha Valentin |
| David Brewer, Michael Carvajal and Allen Beard |
| 0:2020cv00151 |
| December 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| David L Bunning |
| P SO |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER: Petitioner's #8 "Emergency Supplemental Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 Challenging Conditions ofConfinement and Temporary Restraining Order is DENIED. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 2/10/21. (JLS)cc: CORand Jerome Woods by US Mail
|
| Filing 8 MOTION "EMERGENCY SUPPLEMENTAL PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS PURSUANT... CHALLENGING CONDITIONS OR CONFINEMENT AND TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER" by Jerome Woods, pro se.Motions referred to P SO. (Attachments: #1 env, no pm)(JLS) |
| ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: re #8 MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, by Jerome Woods (JLS) |
| Filing 7 JUDGMENT : 1) The Peition filed by #1 Woods is DENIED; and 2) this is a FINAL And APPEALABLE Judgment and there is no just cause for delay. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 1/14/21.(JLS)cc: CORand Jerome Woods by US Mail |
|
Filing 6
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER : 1) The clerk shall SUBSTITUTE Warden J. Allen Beard as the sole respondent in this proceeding; 2) the clerk shall SUBSTITUTE inmate Jerome Woods as the sole petitioner in this proceeding; 3) Petitioner Woods's Petition #1 is DENIED; 4) This action is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the Court's docket; 5) Judgment shall be entered contemporaneously with this Memorandum Opinion and Order. Signed by Judge David L. Bunning on 1/14/21.(JLS)cc: CORand Jerome Woods by US Mail
|
| Filing 5 EMERGENCY SUPPLEMENTAL PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Challenging Conditions of Confinement and TRO, filed by Jerome Woods, pro se (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Individual Needs Plan, #2 env, pm 1-8-21)(JLS) |
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: #5 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (JLS) |
| Filing 4 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption)(KSS) |
| Filing 3 Habeas Filing Fee Filing fee received - $ 5, receipt number 0003329 (KSS) |
| Conflict Check run. (KSS) |
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Jerome Woods, pro se (KSS) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 0003329 received 12/22/20) filed by Jerome Woods. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Trulincs Memo, #2 Exhibit B-USDOJ Memorandum for Inmate Population, #3 Exhibit C-"Extraordinary and Compelling" Reasons document, #4 Exhibit D-CARES Act and Home Confinement article, #5 Certified Mail Envelope)(KSS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
