Fulton v. Hamilton et al
| Richard L. Fulton |
| Hamilton, Gardner, John Doe, Perrin, Adams, Parr, Bhadra, Lee, Joseph, Foulks, George Gourdouze, M. Batts, Katherine Linaweaver and Hector Rios |
| 7:2008cv00077 |
| April 17, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Pikeville Office |
| Martin |
| Karen K. Caldwell |
| Pro Se |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
69
JUDGMENT: it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: (1) Pla, Richard L. Fulton, incarc in the U.S. Penitentiary in Lewisburg, PA, has filed a pro se civil rights complaint assert claims under 28 U.S.C. § 1331, pur to the doctrine announced in Bivens v. Six Un known Fed. Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). 2) The named dfts are:(1) Myron Batts (Associate Warden); (2) Paul Adams (Lieutenant); (3) Bobby Gourdouze (Emergency Preparedness Officer); (4) Frank Perrin, (Lieutenant); (5) Steven Parr (Facilities Manager); (6) Melissa Hamilton (Senior Officer); (7) Lloyd Gardner (Senior Officer); (8) Samiran Bhadra (Physicians Assistant); (9) George Roberts (Correctional Counselor); (10), Joseph George (Unit Manager); (11) Amanda Joseph (Unit Secretary); (12 ) Robert Lee (Correctional Counselor), (13) Jennifer Fultz, (Case Manager); and (14) Katherine Linaweaver (Associate Warden). (3) All constitutional claims asserted by Pla Richard Fulton are dismissed WITH PREJUDICE. (4) Judgment IS ENTERED in favor of the named defendants. (5) This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE ORDER and there is no just cause for delay. (6) The Court certifies that this action has been filed in bad faith (7) This action [7:08-CV-77-KKC] is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and IS STRICKEN from the Courts active docket. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 7/30/09.(MCB)cc: COR w/NOE & copy w/NOE mailed via first class mail to Richard L. Fulton
|
|
Filing
62
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: 1) Fulton's motion for ext of time 60 is GRANTED IN PART & DENIED IN PART as follows: (a) Fulton's motion for ext of time is partially granted & Fulton is granted 20 days from date of this order to file a respo nse to the United States' Motion to Dismiss/Summary Judgment 46 ; (b) Fulton's motion to "stay" consideration of the United States' Motion to Dismiss/Summary Judgment for 30-60 is DENIED; 2) dfts will not be required to respond to the request for production of documents propounded by pro se plaintiff 61 unless & until further orders of the Court are entered. Signed by Judge Karen K. Caldwell on 1/7/2009.(RKT)cc: COR; Richard Fulton via US mail
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
