Courville v. Smith et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|November 22, 2017
JUDGMENT ADOPTING 54 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, Denying 32 Motion for Summary Judgment, 36 Motion for Preliminary Injunction and 42 Motion for Summary Judgment. It is further ordered that this matter is referred to the assigned magistrate judge to hold an evidentiary hearing on exhaustion and on the merits, and thereafter, to issue findings to the court, via report and recommendation. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 11/22/2017. (crt,Crawford, A)
|November 6, 2017
*VACATED* JUDGMENT ADOPTING 54 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, denying 32 Motion for Summary Judgment 36 Motion for Preliminary Injunction and 42 Motion for Summary Judgment. It is Further Ordered that this matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge to hold an evidentiary hearing on exhaustion and on the merits, and to issue findings to the court, via report and recommendation. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 11/6/2017. (crt,Crawford, A) Modified on 11/7/2017 to indicate Judgement vacated(Crawford, A).
|June 7, 2017
ORDER denying 37 Motion to Have Mark Hunter Produce Copies. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Hayes on 6/7/2017. (crt,Williams, L)
|December 14, 2016
JUDGMENT ADOPTING Report and Recommendation 13 . IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiffs claim for failure to provide medical care, as well as any and all claims against Defendant Major Walker, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 12/14/16. (crt,DickersonSld, D)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?