Cases 1 - 10 of 3,301
Huglon v. Bass et al
as 3:2024cv00595
Plaintiff:
S L Huglon
Defendant:
Nolen Bass and A Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Tollick et al
as 3:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
Shaquon RaShawn Johnson
Defendant:
S. Tollick, C. Wynn, J. McClellan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Bass et al
as 5:2024cv02621
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Young
Defendant:
Lieutentant Bass, Sgt. Matthew Taylor, Sgt. Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102 Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA")
Black et al v. Philips North America LLC et al
as 1:2024cv11152
Plaintiff:
Daniel Black, Sally Gadd, Barry Godofsky and others
Defendant:
Philips North America LLC, Philips Holding USA, Inc. and Philips RS North America LLC,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Webb v. Denny et al
as 5:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Bass Webb
Defendant:
Jason Denny, Sergeant Prinkey, Scott Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abercrumble v. Bass et al
as 3:2024cv00571
Plaintiff:
Shelton Abercrumble
Defendant:
Warden Bass, Lt Smith and CO Scout
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ackerman et al v. Arkema Inc.
as 4:2024cv01588
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Ackerman, Mary Ackerman, Sylbestre Aburto and others
Defendant:
Arkema Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Ruiz v. Bass Pro Group LLC et al
as 6:2024cv03122
Plaintiff:
Nora Ruiz
Defendant:
Bass Pro Group LLC and BPS Direct LLC doing business as Bass Pro Shops
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00784
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
