HOFLAND v. LIBERTY
| RANDALL B HOFLAND |
| RANDALL LIBERTY |
| 1:2015cv00414 |
| October 7, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Maine |
| Bangor Office |
| Knox |
| JOHN H. RICH |
| JOHN A. WOODCOCK |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
261
ORDER overruling 256 Objection By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (ccs)
|
|
Filing
255
ORDER ON MOTION TO VACATE AND COK WARNING denying 253 MOTION to Vacate Amended Judgment 245 , Judgment 119 , and Orders 248 , 244 , 118 By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (ccs)
|
|
Filing
251
ORDER ON 250 MOTION TO EXTEND TIME AND MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (ccs)
|
|
Filing
244
ORDER denying 183 Motion for New Trial and Motion for New Process; denying 184 Motion for Findings of Fact and Law. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (MFS)
|
|
Filing
208
ORDER ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION AND MOTIONS FOR RETURN OF ORIGINALS By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (ccs)
|
|
Filing
203
ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS granting in part and denying in part 197 Motion to Extend Time; granting in part and denying in part 198 Objection ; granting 201 Motion to Compel Return ; granting 202 Motion to Return Originals; granting in part and denying in part 202 Motion to Extend Time By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (ccs)
|
|
Filing
193
ORDER overruling without prejudice 191 Plaintiff's Objection to Docket Record. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (MFS)
|
|
Filing
164
ORDER denying 163 Motion to Compel; denying 163 Motion for Copy of Indictments. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (MFS)
|
|
Filing
160
ORDER granting 155 Motion for Clarification ; denying 155 Motion for Copy of ECF 153 By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (sfw)
|
|
Filing
139
ORDER dismissing as moot 136 Motion to Extend Time; granting in part and denying in part 138 Motion for Reconsideration, post-trial motions due 11/26/2016 By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (jwr)
|
|
Filing
118
ORDER adopting 86 Report and Recommended Decision for 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by RANDALL B HOFLAND; dismissing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. No Certificate of Appealability should issue because there is no substantial issue that could be presented on appeal. See Fed.R.App.P.22 and Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Proceedings Under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 or Section 2255. See also First Circuit Local Rule 22.0. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (MFS)
|
|
Filing
86
REPORT AND RECOMMENDED DECISION re 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by RANDALL B HOFLAND Objections to R&R due by 5/31/2016 By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN H. RICH III. (ccs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: HOFLAND v. LIBERTY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: RANDALL B HOFLAND | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: RANDALL LIBERTY | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
