Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Gladu v. Magnusson, et al
as 24-1824
Plaintiff: NICHOLAS A. GLADU
Defendant: RANDALL LIBERTY, in his individual and official capacities as Maine Department of Corrections Commissioner, MATTHEW MAGNUSSON, in his individual and official capacities as Maine State Prison Warden and JAMES HANCOX, in his individual and official capacities as Assistant to the Warden
Brewington v. Joyce, et al
as 23-1730
Plaintiff / Appellant: NOAH J. BREWINGTON
Defendant / Appellee: KEVIN J. JOYCE, Sheriff, Cumberland County Jail, TODD B. BRACKETT, Two Bridges Regional Jail, PUTHIERY VA, Director, Maine CDC and others
Defendant: DAVID J. BOBROW, Attorney, ANDREW S. EDWARDS, Attorney and DANIEL FELDMAN, Attorney
Carleton v. Liberty, et al
as 23-1541
Plaintiff / Appellant: RYAN T. CARLETON
Defendant / Appellee: ERIC BEARCE, MARIE LANDRY, ROBERT YOUNG and others
BREWINGTON v. JOYCE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00199
Plaintiff: NOAH BREWINGTON
Defendant: KEVIN J JOYCE, TODD B BRACKETT, NIRAV SHAH and others
Not Classified By Court: MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - NON PRISONER IFP CASES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Gladu v. Maine Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-1006
Plaintiff / Appellant: NICHOLAS A. GLADU
Plaintiff: ZACHARY SWAIN, ROBERT J. CARROLL, RYAN LANE and others
Defendant / Appellee: MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RANDALL LIBERTY, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Maine Department of Corrections, MATTHEW MAGNUSSON, individually and in his official capacity as Warden of Maine State Prison and others
Defendant: RYAN THORNELL, individually and in his official capacity as Deputy Commissioner of Maine Department of Corrections, DANIEL RITTER, individually and in his official capacity as Health Services Administrator for Wellpath LLC and JOHN NEWBY, individually and in his official capacity as Regional Vice President for Wellpath LLC
SWAIN v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00408
Plaintiff: ZACHARY SWAIN
Defendant: MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RANDALL LIBERTY, RYAN THORNELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARLETON v. LIBERTY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00308
Plaintiff: RYAN T CARLETON
Defendant: RANDALL LIBERTY, ERIC BEARCE, MARIE LANDRY and others
Not Classified By Court: MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gladu v. Maine Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-1645
Plaintiff / Appellant: NICHOLAS A. GLADU
Plaintiff: ZACHARY SWAIN, ROBERT J. CARROLL, RYAN LANE and others
Defendant / Appellee: MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RANDALL LIBERTY, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Maine Department of Corrections, MATTHEW MAGNUSSON, individually and in his official capacity as Warden of Maine State Prison and others
Defendant: RYAN THORNELL, individually and in his official capacity as Deputy Commissioner of Maine Department of Corrections, DANIEL RITTER, individually and in his official capacity as Health Services Administrator for Wellpath LLC and JOHN NEWBY, individually and in his official capacity as Regional Vice President for Wellpath LLC
GLADU v. MAGNUSSON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00134
Plaintiff: NICHOLAS A GLADU
Defendant: MATTHEW MAGNUSSON, JAMES HANCOX, RANDALL LIBERTY and others
Not Classified By Court: MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GLADU v. MAGNUSSON et al
as 1:2022cv00089
Plaintiff: NICHOLAS A GLADU
Defendant: MATTHEW MAGNUSSON, JAMES HANCOX, RANDALL LIBERTY and others
Not Classified By Court: MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?