THORNTON v. LIBERTY
CLIFFORD THORNTON |
RANDALL LIBERTY |
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - HABEAS CASES |
1:2019cv00047 |
January 28, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Maine |
JOHN C NIVISON |
LANCE E WALKER |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 STATE COURT RECORD (Volume I and II) by RANDALL LIBERTY. (jwr) |
Filing 4 ANSWER/RESPONSE/REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by RANDALL LIBERTY. Reply due by 4/12/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Corrected Cover Sheet)(MACOMBER, DONALD) |
Filing 3 **refiled at #4 to included corrected cover sheet**ANSWER/RESPONSE/REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by RANDALL LIBERTY. Reply due by 4/11/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Record)(MACOMBER, DONALD) Modified on 3/13/2019 to indicate refiled.(jwr). |
Filing 2 ORDER TO ANSWER #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Responses due by 4/1/2019. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (MFS) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by CLIFFORD THORNTON. (Attachments: #1 Cover letter to Federal Court, #2 Cover letter to State Court, #3 Envelope addressed to State Court, #4 Envelope addressed to Federal Court)(jwr) |
Filing Fee Received from CLIFFORD THORNTON: Amount Paid: $5.00. Receipt Number: 119000109. Method of Payment: Check. Purpose of Payment: Filing fee. Date Paid: 1/28/19 (jwr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.