PATEL v. UNITED STATES et al
| RAJ K PATEL |
| UNITED STATES, PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN, PUERTO RICO, VICE PRESIDENT KAMALA HARRIS, ALL BIDEN CABINET OFFICERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL MERRICK GARLAND, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES XAVIER BECERRA, SURGEON GENERAL DR VIVEK MURTHY and UNITED NATIONS AMBASSADOR LINDA THOMASGREENFIELD |
| 2:2024cv00044 |
| February 12, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Maine |
| JOHN C NIVISON |
| LANCE E WALKER |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER mooting #15 Motion to Expedite By JUDGE LANCE E. WALKER. (mmy)
|
|
Filing 15
MOTION to Expedite by RAJ K PATEL (mmy)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION denying #13 Motion for Reconsideration re 11 Order on Motion for Reconsideration filed by RAJ K PATEL. By JUDGE LANCE E. WALKER. (mmy)
|
|
Filing 13
Amended MOTION for Reconsideration re 11 Order on Motion for Reconsideration by RAJ K PATEL (mmy)
|
|
Filing 12
MOTION for Reconsideration re 11 Order on Motion for Reconsideration by RAJ K PATEL (mmy)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER denying #10 Motion for Reconsideration re #8 Order on Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED because Plaintiff's complaint presents clearly frivolous claims. By JUDGE LANCE E. WALKER. (mmy)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION for Reconsideration re #8 Order on Report and Recommendations by RAJ K PATEL (mmy)
|
|
Filing 9
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL By DEPUTY CLERK: M. York (mmy)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE adopting Report and Recommended Decision re #5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDED DECISION re #1 Emergency Pro Se Petition for Writ of Mandamus By JUDGE LANCE E. WALKER. (mmy)
|
|
Filing 7
Amended Objection to Report and Recommended Decision re #5 Report and Recommended Decision filed by RAJ K PATEL. (mmy)
|
|
Filing 6
Objection to Report and Recommended Decision re #5 Report and Recommended Decision. filed by RAJ K PATEL. (Attachments: #1 Email)(jwr)
|
|
Filing 5
REPORT AND RECOMMENDED DECISION re #1 Emergency Pro Se Petition for Writ of Mandamus. Objections to R&R due by 2/28/2024. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (MFS)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE: Recently RAJ K PATEL filed a pleading in this Court without representation of an attorney. Information regarding representing yourself is available on the Court's website at #https://www.med.uscourts.gov/handout-self-represented-parties including a Handout for Self-Represented Parties, which was provided to Plaintiff via email on 2/14/2024. This handout is intended for informational and practical purposes only and in no way takes the place of an attorney's legal advice, but it may provide some answers to procedural and general questions. ALSO NOTE: You are responsible for notifying the Court in writing of any changes to your mailing address or telephone number and of any change in status regarding representation by an attorney. (cc: pro se litigant) (mmy)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (NIVISON, JOHN)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs by RAJ K PATEL (mnd)
|
|
Filing 1
Emergency Pro Se Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed by RAJ K PATEL (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(mnd)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
