Cases 1 - 10 of 75
Patel v. The United States et al
as 1:2024cv03392
Plaintiff:
The Excellent Raj K. Patel
Defendant:
The United States and Columbia University in the City of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
PATEL v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2024cv05571
Plaintiff:
THE EXCELLENT RAJ K. PATEL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ALL BIDEN CABINET MEMBERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Patel v. The United States et al
as 5:2024cv02140
Plaintiff:
Raj K. Patel
Defendant:
The United States and Leland Stanford Junior University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
PATEL v. THE UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2024cv01472
Plaintiff:
RAJ K. PATEL
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES and THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PATEL v. THE UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2024cv04669
Plaintiff:
THE EXCELLENT RAJ K. PATEL
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES and PRINCETON UNIVERSITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Patel v. The United States et al
as 3:2024cv00480
Plaintiff:
Raj K. Patel
Defendant:
The United States and Cornell University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Patel v. Alphabet Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00409
Plaintiff:
Raj K. Patel
Defendant:
Alphabet Inc., XXVI Holdings, Inc., Google LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Raj Patel v. United Parcel Services
as 24-1542
Plaintiff:
RAJ K. PATEL
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Raj PatelIn re: Raj Patel
as 24-1337
Petitioner:
In re: RAJ K. PATEL
Respondent:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
