Murchison v. Astrue
Plaintiff: Barbara M. Murchison
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 1:2008cv02665
Filed: October 10, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Baltimore County
Presiding Judge: J. Frederick Motz
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 6, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER re plaintiff's motion for relief from judgment. Signed by Judge J. Frederick Motz on 5/6/11. (jnl, Deputy Clerk) Modified on 5/6/2011 (jnl, Deputy Clerk).
January 6, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 28 MEMORANDUM. Signed by Judge J. Frederick Motz on 1/6/10. (jnl, Deputy Clerk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Murchison v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Barbara M. Murchison
Represented By: Phillip Robert Kete
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?