Kotosski, Jr. v. Astrue
Plaintiff: Joseph Kotosski, Jr.
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 1:2009cv00981
Filed: April 16, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Office: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW Office
County: Baltimore City
Presiding Judge: Benson Everett Legg
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 10, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 42 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan K. Gauvey on 12/7/12. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk)
September 14, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 29 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan K. Gauvey on 9/14/10. (bmh, Deputy Clerk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kotosski, Jr. v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph Kotosski, Jr.
Represented By: Lawrence P Demuth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?