Oates et al v. Dollar Tree Corporate Headquaters et al
Randolph Wayne Oates and Emanuel David Joshua Oates |
Andre Davis, Terrance Sheridanin, Woodland Wilson, David Folberauer, Jane Doe, James Monahan, Baltimore County Police Department, Dennis Belp, Dollar Tree Corporate Headquaters, Officer Sands, John Doe, Catherine Pugh, Baltimore County, Steve Hiabach, Robert McMcullough, Alexander Jones, Gordan Skinner, John McGann, Daniel Kaliszak and Jay Landsman |
1:2019cv01420 |
May 14, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Richard D Bennett |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 d |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER denying (7) Motion of Regina Lewis to Reopen Case; Directing Clerk shall not accept for filing any further pleadings in this case unless it is a Notice of Appeal; Directing Clerk to docket a copy of this order in RDB-19-1420. Signed by Judge Richard D. Bennett on 7/8/2019. Associated Cases: 1:19-cv-01473-RDB, 1:19-cv-01420-RDB (c/m 7/8/19 jnls, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 10 ORDER Denying without prejudice #3 Motion to Dismiss; Granting #9 Motion to Dismiss without prejudice; Dismissing #1 Complaint. Signed by Judge Richard D. Bennett on 6/21/2019. (c/m 6/21/19 bas, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss Case without prejudice by Randolph Wayne Oates(bas, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 8 QC NOTICE: #7 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement filed by Dollar Tree Corporate Headquaters was filed incorrectly. *****Please enter corporate parent/affiliate(s) when prompted. It has been noted as FILED IN ERROR, and the document link has been disabled. (bas, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 7 -[FILED IN ERROR]- Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Dollar Tree Corporate Headquaters (Cherry, Ronald) Modified on 6/20/2019 (bas, Deputy Clerk). |
Filing 6 Rule 12/56 letter mailed to Randolph Wayne Oates and Emanuel David Joshua Oates (c/m 6/19/19 bas, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 5 Rule 12/56 letter mailed to Emanuel David Joshua Oates and Randolph Wayne Oates (c/m 6/19/19 bas, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 4 -[FILED IN ERROR, Incorrect Letter]- Rule 12/56 letter mailed to Randolph Wayne Oates and Emanuel David Joshua Oates (c/m 6/19/19 bas, Deputy Clerk) Modified on 6/19/2019 (bas, Deputy Clerk). |
Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint or in the Alternative Motion for Summary Judgment by Dollar Tree Corporate Headquaters (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Memorandum in Support, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Cherry, Ronald) |
Filing 2 ORDER Granting Plaintiff 28 days from the date of this Order to either pay the full filing fee or file a motion seeking its waiver;Plaintiff IS GRANTED 28 days to provide evidence of his authority to pursue claims as personal representative of Emanuel Oates's estate;Plaintiff IS GRANTED 28 days to AMEND the complaint. Signed by Judge Richard D. Bennett on 5/29/2019. (kw2s, Deputy Clerk)(c/m of order and IFP form 5.29.19) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Baltimore County, Baltimore County Police Department, Dennis Belp, Andre Davis, Jane Doe, John Doe, Dollar Tree Corporate Headquaters, David Folberauer, Steve Hiabach, Alexander Jones, Daniel Kaliszak, Jay Landsman, John McGann, Robert McMcullough, James Monahan, Catherine Pugh, Officer Sands, Terrance Sheridanin, Gordan Skinner, Woodland Wilson, filed by Emanuel David Joshua Oates, Randolph Wayne Oates.(bas, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.