Cases 1 - 10 of 84
Castillo-Rodriguez v. Jones et al
as 3:2026cv00403
Plaintiff:
Cesar Edgardo Castillo-Rodriguez
Defendant:
Chief Alexander Jones, Amy J. Mitchell and Pia R. Lederman
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Pittman et al
as 1:2026cv01065
Plaintiff:
Nathanial Alexander Jones
Defendant:
Rose Pittman, Jenny Scott and Patrick Dollar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv03140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Zachary Alexander Jones v. Leland Dudek
as 2:2025cv02186
Plaintiff:
Zachary Alexander Jones
Defendant:
Leland Dudek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Pendleton v. Kennedy et al
as 3:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Eric C. Pendleton
Defendant:
Randy Kennedy, Elizabeth A. Johnson, Andra Hedrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anthony Harris v. Raven Mack
as 23-7063
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY L. HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
RAVEN DAWN MACK, Sergant at Lanesboro Correctional Institution, in her individual and official capacities originally named as Raven Dawn Mac, KEVIN C. WHITE, Lieutenant at Lanesboro Correctional Institution, in his individual and official capacities formerly known as FNU White, SANDRA J. COLLINS, Officer at Lanesboro Correctional Institution, in her individual and official capacities formerly known as FNU Collins and others
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv16707
Plaintiff:
ROBERTA ALEXANDER JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
