Cooke v. Gang, Warden et al
| Stephen M. Cooke, Jr. |
| Maryland Attorney General and Allen Gang, Warden |
| 1:2019cv03256 |
| November 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Stephanie A Gallagher |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Supplement to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Stephen M. Cooke, Jr (ko, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Signed by Judge Stephanie A. Gallagher on 12/31/2019. (c/m 12/31/19) (ds3, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Allen Gang, Warden, Maryland Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Jawor, Daniel) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel John Jawor on behalf of Allen Gang, Warden, Maryland Attorney General (Jawor, Daniel) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER giving Respondents 40 days to file an answer to the petition on or before the date of this order. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 11/13/2019. (jb5, Deputy Clerk)(c/m-Petitioner, and Daniel Jawor (order and petition-11-13-2019))
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Stephen M. Cooke, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law)(jb5, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 14637119215 (jb5, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
