Cases 1 - 10 of 251
Jacobs v. Bohrer et al
as 1:2024cv03562
Respondent:
William Bohrer and Maryland Attorney General
Petitioner:
Russell Kurt Jacobs, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carter-Bey v. Arnold et al
as 1:2024cv03322
Petitioner:
Matheno Aasim Carter-Bey
Respondent:
Maryland Attorney General and K. Arnold
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henry Hamilton v. David Greene
as 24-7059
Respondent:
ACTING WARDEN DAVID GREENE and MARYLAND ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
HENRY ERIC HAMILTON
Fogg v. Weber et al
as 1:2024cv03174
Plaintiff:
Isaiah D. Fogg
Defendant:
Maryland Attorney General and Ronald S. Weber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03118
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thurston v. Bohrer et al
as 1:2024cv02735
Defendant:
Maryland Attorney General
Respondent:
Bohrer
Petitioner:
Richard Thurston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dietz v. Jones et al
as 1:2024cv02732
Respondent:
Maryland Attorney General and Paige C. Jones
Petitioner:
John G. Dietz, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKenstry v. Weber et al
as 1:2024cv02673
Respondent:
D. Kidwell, R. Shane Weber, K. Sanderlin and others
Petitioner:
Lamar T. McKenstry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kenneth Hinton v. Warden
as 24-6881
Defendant:
MARYLAND ATTORNEY GENERAL and WARDEN
Plaintiff:
KENNETH HINTON
Oliver v. Warden of J.C.I
as 1:2024cv02615
Petitioner:
Craig Oliver
Respondent:
Maryland Attorney General and Warden Robert Dean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
