Cochran v. Bishop et al
Jeremy Shane Cochran |
Maryland Attorney General and Warden Frank Bishop, Jr. |
1:2019cv03391 |
November 25, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Richard D Bennett |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Frank Bishop, Jr, Maryland Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Record, #2 Exhibit 10-1-12 Transcript)(Jawor, Daniel) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Frank Bishop, Jr, Maryland Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Jawor, Daniel) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Jeremy Shane Cochran(ko, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel John Jawor on behalf of Frank Bishop, Jr, Maryland Attorney General (Jawor, Daniel) |
Filing 3 ORDER Granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; Directing respondents to file answer to petition within 40 days. Signed by Judge Richard D. Bennett on 12/2/2019. (c/m 12/02/19 bas, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jeremy Shane Cochran(ko, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Jeremy Shane Cochran. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ko, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.