Spence et al v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Kenneth Johnson and Angela Spence |
Smith & Nephew, Inc. |
1:2020cv03393 |
November 20, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Catherine C Blake |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 RESPONSE in Opposition re (2415 in 1:17-md-02775-CCB) MOTION to Compel Responses to Contention Interrogatories and Requests for Production filed by In re: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit)Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Jenner, Robert) |
Filing 23 Correspondence re: Plaintiffs' Proposal Regarding Order of Bellwether Trials Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Jenner, Robert) |
Filing 22 MOTION to Seal Plaintiffs' Response to Smith & Nephew's Motions to Exclude Expert Opinions by In re: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Jenner, Robert) |
Filing 21 -SEALED-RESPONSE in Opposition re (2387 in 1:17-md-02775-CCB) MOTION to Exclude the Opinion Testimony of Plaintiffs' Expert Witness L. Scott Marshall filed by In re: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit)Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Jenner, Robert) |
Filing 20 -SEALED-RESPONSE in Opposition re (2386 in 1:17-md-02775-CCB) MOTION to Exclude the Opinion Testimony of Plaintiffs' Expert Witness Dr. Jeffrey Shapiro , (2388 in 1:17-md-02775-CCB) MOTION Smith & Nephew, Inc's Motion to Exclude the Opinion Tesimony of Plaintiff's Expert Witness Yadin David , (2385 in 1:17-md-02775-CCB) MOTION to Exclude the Opinion Testimony of Plaintiffs' Expert Witness Mari Truman , (2383 in 1:17-md-02775-CCB) MOTION to Exclude the Opinion Testimony of Plaintiffs' Expert Witness Larry Spears filed by In re: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit list 1-119)Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Jenner, Robert) |
Filing 19 NOTICE by Smith & Nephew, Inc. of Filing Updated Listings of Pending BHR and THA Track Cases (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (BHR Track Cases), #2 Exhibit B (THA Track Cases))Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Wozniak, Jana) |
Filing 18 NOTICE by Smith & Nephew, Inc. of Withdrawal of Appearance Sara J. Gourley Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Wozniak, Jana) |
|
Filing 16 SEALED MEMORANDUM. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 12/23/2020. Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(bmhs, Deputy Clerk) Modified on 12/28/2020 (cags, Deputy Clerk). |
Filing 15 NOTICE by Smith & Nephew, Inc. of Filing Updated Listings of Pending BHR and THA Track Cases (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (BHR Track Cases), #2 Exhibit B (THA Track Cases))Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Gourley, Sara) |
Filing 14 NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings held on 12/9/2020, before Judge Catherine C. Blake. Court Reporter Christine T. Asif, Telephone number 4109624492. Total number of pages filed: 51. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained from the Court Reporter or through PACER. Redaction Request due 1/6/2021. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 1/19/2021. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 3/16/2021.Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(ca, Court Reporter) |
Filing 13 Consent MOTION for entry of Case Management Order No. 18 (Pretrial Scheduling Order for THA Track Cases) by Smith & Nephew, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order [Joint Proposed] Case Management Order No. 18)Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Gourley, Sara) |
|
Filing 11 NOTICE by Smith & Nephew, Inc. of Filing Updated Listings of Pending BHR and THA Track Cases (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (BHR Track Cases), #2 Exhibit B (THA Track Cases))Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Gourley, Sara) |
Filing 10 MOTION Smith & Nephew, Inc's Motion to Exclude the Opinion Tesimony of Plaintiff's Expert Witness Yadin David by Smith & Nephew, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Memorandum in Support, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B)Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Gourley, Sara) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Exclude the Opinion Testimony of Plaintiffs' Expert Witness L. Scott Marshall by Smith & Nephew, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Memorandum in Support, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Exhibit G, #10 Exhibit H, #11 Exhibit I, #12 Exhibit J, #13 Exhibit K, #14 Exhibit L)Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Gourley, Sara) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Exclude the Opinion Testimony of Plaintiffs' Expert Witness Dr. Jeffrey Shapiro by Smith & Nephew, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Memorandum in Support, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B)Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Gourley, Sara) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Exclude the Opinion Testimony of Plaintiffs' Expert Witness Mari Truman by Smith & Nephew, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Memorandum in Support, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B)Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Gourley, Sara) |
Filing 6 Memorandum re (2383 in 1:17-md-02775-CCB) MOTION to Exclude the Opinion Testimony of Plaintiffs' Expert Witness Larry Spears filed by Smith & Nephew, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Gourley, Sara) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Exclude the Opinion Testimony of Plaintiffs' Expert Witness Larry Spears by Smith & Nephew, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Gourley, Sara) |
Filing 4 STIPULATION To Extend BHR Case Specific Expert Deadlines by In re: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Jenner, Robert) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings held on 11/24/20, before Judge Blake. Court Reporter/Transcriber Douglas J. Zweizig, RDR, CRR, Telephone number (410) 962-4474 / douglas_zweizig@mdd.uscourts.gov. Total number of pages filed: 16. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained from the Court Reporter or through PACER. Redaction Request due 12/15/2020. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/28/2020. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 2/22/2021.Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(dz, Court Reporter) |
Filing 2 STATUS REPORT Parties Proposed Agenda for November 24, 2020 Status Conference by Smith & Nephew, Inc.Associated Cases: 1:17-md-02775-CCB et al.(Gourley, Sara) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Short Form against Smith & Nephew, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0416-8976909.), filed by Angela Spence, Kenneth Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Tankard, George) |
Case Assigned to Judge Catherine C. Blake. (ko, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.