Robinson v. State of Maryland
| Mack M. Robinson |
| State of Maryland and Maryland Attorney General |
| 1:2021cv01730 |
| August 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Peter J Messitte |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER directing Respondents to file an Answer to the Petition on or before 40 days from the date of this Order; Petitioner may reply 28 days after service of Respondents' Answer; directing the Clerk to amend the docket to add the Maryland Attorney General. Signed by Judge Peter J. Messitte on 9/21/2021. (c/m 09/22/2021 jj2, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 3
Supplemental to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Mack M. Robinson (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G)(ybs, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 14637129712 (jb5, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER granting Petitioner 28 days from the date of this Order to supplement the Petition; directing Petitioner to complete and return the affidavit or submit the $5.00 filing fee within 28 days of this order. Signed by Judge Peter J. Messitte on 8/24/2021. (c/m 08/25/2021 jj2, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Mack M. Robinson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 Cover Letter)(jj2, Deputy Clerk)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
