Litchfield v. Rinehart et al
Adam Litchfield |
Ronald S. Rinehart, Jason Lee, Shante T. Reese, Baltimore City Police Department and Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services |
1:2021cv02101 |
August 18, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
George Levi Russell |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1446 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael O Connor Doyle on behalf of Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services (Doyle, Michael) |
Filing 18 ORDER granting #17 Defendants' Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Judge George Levi Russell, III on 8/25/2021. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 17 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #5 Complaint, by Jason Lee, Shante T. Reese, Ronald S. Rinehart. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Goldberg, Stuart) |
Filing 16 Correspondence re: Statement pursuant to Standing Order Concerning Removal (Corley, James) |
Filing 15 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Ronald S. Rinehart (Goldberg, Stuart) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Stuart R Goldberg on behalf of Ronald S. Rinehart (Goldberg, Stuart) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas H Barnard on behalf of Ronald S. Rinehart (Barnard, Thomas) |
Filing 12 Summons Issued 21 days as to Jason Lee and Shante T. Reese.(bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 11 Correspondence re: Summons (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Simon, Edward) |
Filing 10 Standing Order Concerning Removal. Signed by Judge George Levi Russell, III on 8/20/2021. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
CIVIL CASE FILING FEE: $ 402, receipt number 0416-9446800(Corley, James) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Filing Notice of Removal. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 8 Summons Returned Executed as to Baltimore City Police Department. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 7 Summons Returned Executed as to Ronald S. Rinehart. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Baltimore City Police Department.(bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 5 COMPLAINT against Baltimore City Police Department, Jason Lee, Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, Shante T. Reese, Ronald S. Rinehart filed by Adam Litchfield. (Attachments: #1 Case Information Report)(bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS (5-9) ARE COPIES OF ORIGINAL PAPERS FILED IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 4 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Baltimore Police Department (Corley, James) |
Filing 3 Supplemental to Removal (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Circuit Court File)(Corley, James) |
Filing 2 NOTICE by Baltimore Police Department Civil Cover Sheet (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(Corley, James) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court for Baltimore City, case number 24-C-21-002579., filed by Baltimore Police Department. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Documents served on BPD, #2 Exhibit State Court Removal Notice)(Corley, James) |
The case of Litchfield v. Rinehart et al, has been opened in the District of Maryland. The case number is GLR-21-2101. PLEASE NOTE: You must pay the case filing fee within 48 hours. To pay online, select the event Civil Case Filing Fee which is found under Civil Events --> Other Filings --> Other Documents. Otherwise, forward a check made payable to Clerk, U.S. District Court and note the assigned case number on the check or cover letter. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.