Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 100
USA v. Garza
as 26-10584
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Jason Lee Garza
Fedewa v. Tanner
as 4:2026cv11964
Petitioner: Jason Lee Fedewa
Respondent: Jeff Tanner
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Harris #113830 v. Mesa Police Department et al
as 2:2026cv03376
Plaintiff: Jason Lee Harris
Defendant: Mesa Police Department and Maricopa County Adult Probation Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schwartz v. Warden
as 3:2026cv00604
Plaintiff: Jason Lee Schwartz
Defendant: Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CALDWELL v. GOSMAN et al
as 1:2026cv00857
Plaintiff: JASON LEE CALDWELL
Defendant: DEREK GOSMAN, STELLA, BAH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Jason Ringold
as 26-1814
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Jason Lee Ringold, also known as Ringo
Harris v. Thornell, et al.
as 26-2549
Plaintiff: JASON LEE HARRIS
Defendant: RYAN THORNELL, DIRECTOR OF THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REHABILITATION, Director - Arizona Dept. of Corrections Rehab & Reentry, ERIC HANSEN, Deputy Warden, ARIZONA STATE PRISON COMPLEX - TUCSON, Cimarron Unit named as A.S.P.C. Tucson - Cimarron III and others
Van Dyke v. Insurance Supermarket, Inc.
as 4:2026cv00326
Plaintiff: Jason Lee Van Dyke
Defendant: Insurance Supermarket, Inc. doing business as Insurance Supermarket International
Pretrial Service: ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Hand v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2026cv06277
Plaintiff: Jason Lee Hand
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Harris #113830 v. Thornell et al
as 4:2026cv00111
Plaintiff: Jason Lee Harris
Defendant: Ryan Thornell, Eric Hansen, Arizona State Prison Complex Tucson Cimarron Unit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?