Cases 1 - 8 of 8
SCHWARTZ v. ERNEST, et al
as 1:2023cv01485
Plaintiff:
JASON LEE SCHWARTZ
Defendant:
J. ERNEST, MR JACKSON, FISH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schwartz v. Ernest et al
as 3:2023cv00770
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Schwartz and Jason Schwartz
Defendant:
J Ernest, Jackson, Fish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MANERY v. LEE et al
as 1:2022cv00239
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MANERY
Defendant:
JASON LEE, MARION COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND MARION COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR et al v. PRULHIERE et al
as 1:2020cv01282
Defendant:
PAUL PRULHIERE, C. ROLLAND, VANDERHILL and others
Plaintiff:
JASON LEE TAYLOR, JUSTIN LEE TAYLOR and Jason Lee Taylor IDOC Number
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
INDIANA CARPENTERS PENSION FUND et al v. MAMMOTH, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv04234
Plaintiff:
UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS APPRENTICESHIP TRAINING FUND OF NORTH AMERICA, INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS, INDIANA/KENTUCKY/OHIO REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PENSION TRUST FUND and others
Defendant:
Mammoth, Inc. and Jason Lee Marlow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
HOWARD v. INDIANA STATE PAROLE BOARD et al
as 1:2011cv01503
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA, INDIANA STATE PAROLE BOARD and MARION COUNTY SHERIFF
Petitioner:
JASON LEE HOWARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WARMAN v. RODDEN et al
as 4:2008cv00177
Plaintiff:
JASON LEE WARMAN
Defendant:
DANIEL RODDEN, RICK ELLIOTT, SAM BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MARSH v. CLARK COUNTY, INDIANA et al
as 4:2008cv00014
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN P. MARSH
Defendant:
CLARK COUNTY, INDIANA, DANIEL RODDEN, CHALICE BAIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
