McClymont et al v. Jaddou et al
| Everton A. McClymont and Stacy V. Murdock McClymont |
| Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas and Christopher Wray |
| 1:2021cv02141 |
| August 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Catherine C Blake |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 8 U.S.C. ยง 1101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #9 Motion to Transfer and for an Extension of Time; and transferring the case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 10/7/2021. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Case electronically transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE by Everton A. McClymont, Stacy V. Murdock McClymont re #9 MOTION to Transfer Case to the Eastern District of New York CONSENT TO TRANSFER TO EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (Goldstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Transfer Case to the Eastern District of New York by Merrick Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Christopher Wray (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Text of Proposed Order)(Cusson, Evelyn) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Everton A. McClymont, Stacy V. Murdock McClymont. Merrick Garland served on 9/8/2021, answer due 11/8/2021; Ur Mendoza Jaddou served on 9/8/2021, answer due 11/8/2021; Alejandro Mayorkas served on 9/8/2021, answer due 11/8/2021; Christopher Wray served on 9/8/2021, answer due 11/8/2021.(Goldstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 7 QC NOTICE: #6 Summons Returned Executed filed by Everton A. McClymont, Stacy V. Murdock McClymont was filed incorrectly. **Please refile using the event under Service of Process - Summons Returned Executed as to USA and enter the service date for the U.S. Attorney. It has been noted as FILED IN ERROR, and the document link has been disabled. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 6 (FILED IN ERROR) SUMMONS Returned Executed by Everton A. McClymont, Stacy V. Murdock McClymont. Merrick Garland served on 9/7/2021, answer due 9/28/2021; Ur Mendoza Jaddou served on 9/7/2021, answer due 9/28/2021; Alejandro Mayorkas served on 9/7/2021, answer due 9/28/2021; Christopher Wray served on 9/7/2021, answer due 9/28/2021.(Goldstein, Joshua) Modified on 9/23/2021 (bmhs, Deputy Clerk). |
| Filing 5 Status Conference held on 9/1/2021 before Judge Peter J. Messitte. (Court Reporter: Linda Marshall - via Zoom) (tds, Deputy Clerk) |
|
Filing 4
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER lifting stay; directing the U.S. Attorney's Office to file a universal Motion to Transfer in appropriate pending court cases within 30 days. Signed by Judge Peter J. Messitte on 9/1/2021. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 3
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Signed by Judge Peter J. Messitte on 8/26/2021. (Attachments: #1 List of Visa Cases)(bmhs, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued 60 days as to Merrick Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Christopher Wray, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General(bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT /Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Complaint for Injunctive Relief against Merrick Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Christopher Wray ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0416-9447937.), filed by Everton A. McClymont, Stacy V. Murdock McClymont. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Goldstein, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
