Coleman v. Smith et al
Plaintiff: Arthur Coleman
Defendant: Christopher Smith and Brian E. Frosh
Case Number: 1:2022cv00646
Filed: March 16, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Presiding Judge: Theodore D Chuang
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 13, 2022 Filing 9 MOTION to Seal ECF 1 & ECF 8 through 8-6 by Brian E. Frosh, Christopher Smith (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(DiMiceli, Andrew)
May 13, 2022 Filing 8 -SEALED - NOTICE of Filing Under Seal by Brian E. Frosh, Christopher Smith re #7 Response to Habeas Petition (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Transcript 01/24/2017, #2 Exhibit Transcript 01/25/2017, #3 Exhibit Transcript 01/26/2017, #4 Exhibit Transcript 01/27/2017, #5 Exhibit Transcript 12/12/2019, #6 Exhibit Transcript 09/17/2020)(DiMiceli, Andrew)
May 13, 2022 Filing 7 RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Brian E. Frosh, Christopher Smith. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Record, #2 Exhibit Notice of Filing Exhibit or Attachment Under Seal)(DiMiceli, Andrew)
April 11, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew DiMiceli on behalf of Brian E. Frosh, Christopher Smith (DiMiceli, Andrew)
April 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; directing Respondent FILE an Answer to the Petition within 40 days from the date of this Order; directing Coleman to FILE a Reply to any Answer within 30 days of Respondent. Signed by Judge Theodore D. Chuang on 4/4/2022. (c/m to P to F bs4s, Deputy Clerk) (bs4s, Deputy Clerk).
March 31, 2022 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Arthur Coleman (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jj2s, Deputy Clerk)
March 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER directing the Plaintiff to pay the filing fee of $5.00 or complete and return the Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis within 28 days from the date of this order. Signed by Judge Theodore D. Chuang on 3/22/2022. (c/m to P 3/22/2022 bs4, Deputy Clerk)
March 16, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Arthur Coleman (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(bs4, Deputy Clerk)
March 16, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Arthur Coleman. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(bs4, Deputy Clerk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Coleman v. Smith et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Arthur Coleman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christopher Smith
Represented By: Andrew DiMiceli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brian E. Frosh
Represented By: Andrew DiMiceli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?