Jackson v. Walgreen Company
| Kenneth Jackson |
| Walgreen Company and Walgreen Co. |
| 1:2022cv01718 |
| July 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Matthew James Maddox |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
SCHEDULING ORDER: Status Report due by 12/23/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Matthew James Maddox on 8/10/2022. (Attachments: #1 Scheduling Order, #2 Standing Order Concerning Discovery) (ols, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 16
PAPERLESS ORDER: In accordance with 28 USC 636(c), all parties have voluntarily consented to have Magistrate Judge Matthew James Maddox conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and entry of final judgment, and conduct all post-judgment proceedings, with direct review by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, if an appeal is filed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Matthew James Maddox on 8/10/2022. (dass, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 15 QC NOTICE re: 14 25 Pct Mag - Consent to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge. **Consent/Decline is a restricted document. Attachments should not be filed to it. If counsel deems necessary, please re-file attachments separately in the capacity intended. (dass, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re: #11 Consent/Decline to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge. Walgreen Co. must correct the following error(s):**Pursuant to the Magistrate Judge Pilot Project Procedures, consent/declination forms are to be filed with the event 25 Pct Mag Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge OR 25 Pct Mag Decline to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge, both located in Other Filings >Other Documents. (kk5s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 11 [FILED IN ERROR] NOTICE by Walgreen Co. re 9 25 Pct Mag - Notice of Case Assignment to a Magistrate Judge,,,, (Lounsbury, Stacey) Modified on 8/1/2022 (kk5s, Deputy Clerk). |
|
Filing 10
Case Management Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Matthew James Maddox on 7/21/2022. (kk5s, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Case Assignment. This case has been assigned to Magistrate Judge Matthew J. Maddox. Walgreen Co. or counsel for Walgreen Co. are required to review and comply with the Magistrate Judge Pilot Project Procedures which can be downloaded #here. Pursuant to Standing Order 2019-07, which can be downloaded #here, counsel has 14 days from the date of this notice to file their consent, or decline to consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. To file your consent, go to Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > 25 Pct Mag - Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge. To file your declination, go to Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > 25 Pct Mag - Decline to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge. Failure to file a consent or declination will result in issuance of an Order to Show Cause. Please review the case management order that has been issued in this case. Magistrate Election Form due by 8/4/2022. (kk5s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Case Assignment. This case has been assigned to Magistrate Judge Matthew J. Maddox. Kenneth Jackson or counsel for Kenneth Jackson are required to review and comply with the Magistrate Judge Pilot Project Procedures which can be downloaded #here. Pursuant to Standing Order 2019-07, which can be downloaded #here, counsel has 14 days from the date of this notice to file their consent, or decline to consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. To file your consent, go to Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > 25 Pct Mag - Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge. To file your declination, go to Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > 25 Pct Mag - Decline to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge. Failure to file a consent or declination will result in issuance of an Order to Show Cause. Please review the case management order that has been issued in this case. Magistrate Election Form due by 8/4/2022. (jb5s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #3 Complaint by Walgreen Co..(Lounsbury, Stacey) |
| Filing 6 Clerk's Notice of Standing Order concerning removal actions filed in this Court, which can be downloaded #here. (jb5s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE Of Filing Notice of Removal by Walgreen Co. (jb5s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 4 STATE COURT Summons Issued as to Walgreen Co..(jb5s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 3 STATE COURT COMPLAINT against Walgreen Co., filed by Kenneth Jackson. (Attachments: #1 State Court Summons)(jb5s, Deputy Clerk) |
| THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS (3-5) ARE COPIES OF ORIGINAL PAPERS FILED IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY. (jb5s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 2 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Walgreen Company identifying Corporate Parent WALGREENS BOOTS ALLIANCE for Walgreen Company.(Lounsbury, Stacey) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Maryland of Baltimore City, case number 24-C-22-000016. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AMDDC-10045644), filed by Walgreen Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 to Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2 to Notice of Removal, #3 Supplement Statement of Filing and Service of Notification of Removal, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 1 to Notification, #5 Civil Cover Sheet Cover Sheet)(Lounsbury, Stacey) |
| Case Assigned to Magistrate Judge Matthew James Maddox. (jb5s, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
