Ivanov v. Jones et al
| Ivanov S. Patel and Pavel S. Ivanov |
| Paige C. Jones and Maryland Attorney General |
| 1:2023cv02903 |
| October 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Theodore D Chuang |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by William Elliott Hunter on behalf of Paige C. Jones, Maryland Attorney General (Hunter, William) |
Filing 6
ORDER directing that Respondents shall file an Answer to the Petition within 40 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Theodore D. Chuang on 11/21/2023. (c/m p and c/em as directed 11/21/23 ols, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Pavel S. Ivanov (ols, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Evidentiary Hearing by Pavel S. Ivanov (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (ols, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Release of Prisoner in a Habeas Corpus Proceeding by Pavel S. Ivanov (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (ols, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 2 New Case Notification Letter sent to Ivanov S. Patel. (c/m p 10/25/23 ols, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 6317 (ols, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Ivanov S. Patel. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Envelope) (ols, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
