Brice v. Weber et al
| Aaron L. Brice |
| Ronald Webee, Maryland Attorney General and Ronald Weber |
| 1:2023cv03101 |
| November 9, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Theodore D Chuang |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Maryland Attorney General, Ronald Weber. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Record, #2 Exhibit Transcript 11-04-2021, #3 Exhibit Transcript 11-30-2021)(DiMiceli, Andrew) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew DiMiceli on behalf of Maryland Attorney General, Ronald Weber (DiMiceli, Andrew) |
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; Respondant shall file an Answer to Petition within 40 days of the date of this Order; directing the Clerk to amend the docket; Brice shall notify the Court of any change of address. Signed by Judge Theodore D. Chuang on 12/6/2023. (c/m & c/em as directed 12/6/2023 - mg3s, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 3 New Case Notification Letter sent to Aaron L. Brice. (c/m 11/15/2023 - mg3s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Aaron L. Brice(mg3s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Aaron L. Brice. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(mg3s, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
