Cooper v. Bohrer et al
Carl Anthony Cooper |
William S. Bohrer and Maryland Attorney General |
1:2023cv03522 |
December 21, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Lydia Kay Griggsby |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew DiMiceli on behalf of William S. Bohrer, Maryland Attorney General (DiMiceli, Andrew) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting #2 Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis ; directing that Respondent shall file an Answer to the Petition on or before 40 days from the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Lydia Kay Griggsby on 1/17/2024. (c/m p and c/em as directed 1/18/24 ols, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 4 Correspondence from Carl Anthony Cooper re: Request for Case Number (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (ols, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 1665 (dhs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 3 New Case Notification Letter sent to Carl Anthony Cooper. (c/m p 12/29/23 ols, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Carl Anthony Cooper (ols, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Carl Anthony Cooper. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope) (ols, Deputy Clerk) Modified on 12/29/2023 (ols, Deputy Clerk). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.