Santos v. Brown et al
Petitioner: Erick Anthony Santos and Erick Javier Santos Bey
Respondent: Anthony Brown doing business as Atty General and Carlos Bivens
Case Number: 1:2024cv00468
Filed: February 20, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Presiding Judge: Matthew J Maddox
Nature of Suit: Mandamus & Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 18, 2024 Filing 9 RESPONSE in Opposition re #7 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Carlos Bivens, Anthony Brown. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(DiMiceli, Andrew)
April 15, 2024 Filing 8 REPLY re #6 Response to Habeas Petition filed by Erick Anthony Santos. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kb3s, Deputy Clerk)
April 15, 2024 Filing 7 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Erick Anthony Santos (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(kb3s, Deputy Clerk)
April 9, 2024 Filing 6 RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Carlos Bivens, Anthony Brown. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Record Volume 1, #2 Exhibit State Record Volume 2)(DiMiceli, Andrew)
March 19, 2024 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew DiMiceli on behalf of Carlos Bivens, Anthony Brown (DiMiceli, Andrew)
March 18, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER Directing Respondents to FILE a response within 40 days of the date of this Order. Signed by District Judge Matthew J. Maddox on 3/18/2024. (kb3s, Deputy Clerk)(c/m 3.19.24)(copy of order & petition emailed to Office of the Attorney General State of Maryland 3.19.24)
March 7, 2024 Filing 3 Supplement to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Erick Anthony Santos (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kb3s, Deputy Clerk)
February 20, 2024 Filing 2 New Case Notification Letter sent to Erick Anthony Santos. (kb3s, Deputy Clerk)(c/m 2.22.24)
February 20, 2024 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 1765.), filed by Erick Anthony Santos. (Attachments: #1 Receipt, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Affidavit, #6 Envelope)(kb3s, Deputy Clerk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Santos v. Brown et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Erick Anthony Santos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Erick Javier Santos Bey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Anthony Brown doing business as Atty General
Represented By: Andrew DiMiceli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Carlos Bivens
Represented By: Andrew DiMiceli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?