Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00468
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-6247
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00099
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Injunctive/Declaratory Relief
Santos Bey v. Frosh et al
as 1:2023cv00149
Petitioner:
Erick Javier Santos Bey
Respondent:
Brian Frosh, Warden Robert Dean and The State Of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Santos Bey v. Berry et al
as 1:2021cv03229
Plaintiff:
Erick Javier Santos Bey doing business as Erick Anthony Santos
Defendant:
Troy Berry and Kevin Foster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Santos Bey v. The State Of Maryland et al
as 8:2021cv03160
Plaintiff:
The State Of Maryland, Charles County Sheriffs, Detective Robert Smith and others
Defendant:
Erick Javier Santos Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02937
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02705
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SANTOS BEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2021cv02394
Plaintiff:
ERICK JAVIER SANTOS BEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BEY v. SOMERSET COUNTY COURTHOUSE et al
as 3:2021cv00156
Plaintiff:
ERICK JAVIER SANTOS BEY and ERICK ANTHONY SANTOS
Defendant:
SOMERSET COUNTY COURTHOUSE, THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, MAGISTRATE JUDGE SCOTT BITTNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
