Mesmer v. St. Mary's County et al
| William R. Mesmer |
| St. Mary's County, Karen H. Abrams, Richard D. Fritz, Christina L. Taylor, Kevin J. McDevitt, The Maryland State Police, Redmond, Jeffrey Linger, Robert Rezza, St. Mary's County Sherriff, Department of Corrections, George A. Hayden, Austin E. Bernard, Andre Hill, Krista Morazes, Sarah J. Norris, Stephen J. Goddard, Elizabeth Shaffer and Karen J. Porter |
| 8:2010cv01053 |
| April 28, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Greenbelt Office |
| St. Mary's |
| Deborah K. Chasanow |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
MEMORANDUM OPINION (c/m to Plaintiff 11/14/11 sat). Signed by Chief Judge Deborah K. Chasanow on 11/14/11. (sat, Chambers) Modified on 11/14/2011 to edit text. (rss, Deputy Clerk).
|
|
Filing
41
MEMORANDUM OPINION (c/m to Plaintiff 6/2/11 sat). Signed by Chief Judge Deborah K. Chasanow on 6/2/11. (sat, Chambers)
|
|
Filing
28
MEMORANDUM OPINION (c/m to Plaintiff 2/9/11 sat). Signed by Chief Judge Deborah K. Chasanow on 2/9/11. (sat, Chambers)
|
|
Filing
24
MEMORANDUM OPINION (c/m to Plaintiff 11/18/10 sat). Signed by Chief Judge Deborah K. Chasanow on 11/18/10. (sat, Chambers)
|
|
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Chief Judge Deborah K. Chasanow on 05/06/2010. (elts, Deputy Clerk) (c/m 5/7/10)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
