Cases 1 - 7 of 7
The Regents of the University of California v. Aisen et al
as 8:2017cv00721
Plaintiff:
The Regents of the University of California
Defendant:
Paul S. Aisen , Jeremy Pizzola , Gustavo Jimenez-Maggiora and others
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
The Regents of the UC v. Paul Aisen, et al
as 17-55307
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellee:
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, a California Corporation
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellant:
PAUL S. AISEN, JEREMY PIZZOLA, DEBORAH TOBIAS and others
The Regents of the University v. Paul Aisen, et al
as 16-56397
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellant:
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, a California Corporation
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellee:
PAUL S. AISEN, JEREMY PIZZOLA, DEBORAH TOBIAS and others
The Regents of the University of California v. Aisen et al
as 3:2015cv01766
Plaintiff:
The Regents of the University of California
Defendant:
Paul S. Aisen , Jeremy Pizzola , Deborah Tobias and others
Cross_claimant:
Hong Mei Qiu , Jia-Sing So , Phuoc Hong and others
Cross_defendant:
The Regents of the University of California
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
Mesmer v. St. Mary's County et al
as 8:2010cv01053
Plaintiff:
William R. Mesmer
Defendant:
St. Mary's County, Karen H. Abrams, Richard D. Fritz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rhino Sports, Inc. et al v. Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut et al
as 2:2009cv00299
Plaintiff:
Rhino Sports, Inc., Rhino Sports, Inc., Rhino Sports, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Travelers Indemnity Company, Travelers Indemnity Company, Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
