Brown-Mayo v. Target Corporation
Plaintiff: Veronica Brown-Mayo
Defendant: Target Corporation
Case Number: 8:2018cv02332
Filed: August 3, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Office: Greenbelt Office
County: Prince George's
Presiding Judge: Charles B Day
Referring Judge: Paula Xinis
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 13 LETTER/ORDER re: referral for all proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles B. Day on 9/11/2018. (Attachments: #1 Discovery Policy Memorandum)(jf3s, Deputy Clerk)
September 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 PAPERLESS ORDER ADOPTING #9 the Status Report and deadlines set forth therein. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles B. Day on 9/12/2018. (Day, Charles)
September 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER Directing Parties to Submit Magistrate Judge Consent Form(s) re #10 Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge Paula Xinis on 9/7/2018 (cags, Deputy Clerk)
September 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Charles B. Day for all Proceedings. Signed by Judge Paula Xinis on 9/7/2018. (cags, Deputy Clerk)
August 27, 2018 Filing 9 Status Report Submitted Initial by Veronica Brown-Mayo (Sims, Tiffany)
August 27, 2018 Filing 8 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Veronica Brown-Mayo (Sims, Tiffany)
August 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Letter Order Regarding the Filing of Discovery Motions. Signed by Judge Paula Xinis on 8/17/2018. (jf3s, Deputy Clerk)
August 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SCHEDULING ORDER: Status Report due by 12/31/2018. Signed by Judge Paula Xinis on 8/17/2018. (jf3s, Deputy Clerk)
August 9, 2018 Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by Target Corporation.(Ward, Margaret)
August 7, 2018 Filing 4 RESPONSE re #2 Standing Order Concerning Removal filed by Target Corporation.(Ward, Margaret)
August 7, 2018 Filing 3 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Target Corporation identifying Corporate Parent Target Corporation for Target Corporation.(Ward, Margaret)
August 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Standing Order Concerning Removal. Signed by Judge Paula Xinis on 8/3/2018. (ko, Deputy Clerk)
August 3, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court for Prince George's County, case number CAL18-20878. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 14637107944), filed by Target Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Letter, #3 complaint, #4 Writ of Summons, #5 Service of Process, #6 Case Information Report, #7 Notice of Federal Removal)(ko, Deputy Clerk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brown-Mayo v. Target Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Veronica Brown-Mayo
Represented By: Tiffany Nicole Sims
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Target Corporation
Represented By: Margaret Fonshell Ward
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?