Johnson v. Supko
Plaintiff: Harvey Johnson
Defendant: Michael Supko and United States Of America
Case Number: 8:2021cv03317
Filed: December 30, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Presiding Judge: Deborah K Chasanow
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 PAPERLESS ORDER GRANTING #9 motion for extension of time to answer. The United States of America may have to and including March 2, 2022, to respond to Plaintiff's complaint. Signed by Judge Deborah K. Chasanow on 2/1/2022. (Chasanow, Deborah)
January 31, 2022 Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by United States Of America(Haven, Matthew)
January 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER GRANTING #4 motion to substitute the United States of America as Defendant and GRANTING #3 unopposed motion for extension of time to answer. The United States of America may have to and including January 31, 2022, to respond to Plaintiff's complaint. Signed by Judge Deborah K. Chasanow on 1/18/2022. (sat, Chambers)
December 30, 2021 Filing 7 Clerk's Notice of Standing Order concerning removal actions filed in this Court, which can be downloaded #here. (mg3s, Deputy Clerk)
December 30, 2021 Filing 6 THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS (5) ARE COPIES OF ORIGINAL PAPERS FILED IN THE DISTRICT COURT FOR PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY. (mg3s, Deputy Clerk)
December 30, 2021 Filing 5 STATE COURT COMPLAINT against Michael Supko, filed by Harvey Johnson.(mg3s, Deputy Clerk)
December 30, 2021 Filing 4 MOTION to Substitute Party by Michael Supko (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Haven, Matthew)
December 30, 2021 Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time by Michael Supko (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Haven, Matthew)
December 30, 2021 Filing 2 Local Rule 103.5 Filing of State Court Papers(Haven, Matthew)
December 30, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from District Court of Maryland for Prince Georges County, case number 050200017112020., filed by Michael Supko. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #3 Summons as filed in State Court, #4 Complaint as filed in State Court, #5 Notice of Intention to Introduce Evidence as filed in State Court, #6 Supko Scope Cert)(Haven, Matthew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Supko
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Harvey Johnson
Represented By: Joshua C Sussex
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Supko
Represented By: Matthew A Haven
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Of America
Represented By: Matthew A Haven
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?