Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al v. E*Trade Access, Inc., et al
| Commonwealth of Massachusetts, National Federation of the Blind, Inc., National Federation of the Blind of Massachusetts, Inc., Adrienne Asch, Theresa Jeraldi, Philip Oliver and Jennifer Bose |
| E*Trade Access, Inc., E*Trade Bank, Electronic Funds Transfer Association, Cardtronics, Inc. and Cardtronics USA, Inc. |
| 1:2003cv11206 |
| June 25, 2003 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Suffolk |
| Nathaniel M. Gorton |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
425
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ENDORSED ORDER Approving Amendment to Class Action Settlement Agreement entered. re 422 Joint MOTION for Order to Approve Amendment to Class Action Settlement Agreement filed by Cardtronics, Inc., Cardtronics USA, Inc. (Caruso, Stephanie)
|
|
Filing
338
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: "In accordance with the foregoing, plaintiffs' second motion for contempt (Docket No. 312 ) is ALLOWED, subject to further specificity to be determined after an upcoming hearing. So ordered."(Moore, Kellyann)
|
|
Filing
308
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: " In accordance with the foregoing, plaintiff's motion for contempt (Docket No. 290 ) is ALLOWED, in part, and DENIED, in part. Defendants are directed: 1) to achieve full co mpliance with the Remediation Plan on or before March 15, 2012. Such compliance shall include: a) the installation of enhanced scripts to enable voice guidance, tactilely discernable controls and appropriate signage on all Cardtronic-owned ATMs not l ocated in 7-Eleven stores, and b) the inspection of all such ATMs to ensure that the newly installed features are in working condition; 2) to pay to plaintiffs reasonable attorneys fees and costs incurred in connection with the filing and prosecution of this motion for contempt, the amount of which shall be determined by the Court after the submission by plaintiffs of supporting pleadings to which defendants may respond. Defendants' cross-motion for enforcement of the settlement agreement (Docket No. 294 ) is DENIED. So ordered." (Moore, Kellyann)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
