Mandeville v. Thompson
1:2005cv11969 |
September 27, 2005 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Boston Office |
Nancy Gertner |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 68 Judge Mark L. Wolf: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner's Motion for Certificate of Appealability (Docket No. 66) is DENIED as MOOT. 2. Petitioner's Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Docket No. 67-1) is DENIED. 3. The Clerk shall transmit a copy of this Order to the Office of the Clerk of the First Circuit.(Hohler, Daniel) |
Filing 58 Judge Mark L. Wolf: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER 1. Petitioner's Notice to Reopen Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Docket No. 49) is ALLOWED. 2. Petitioner's Petition to Reopen Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus II (Docket No . 56) is DENIED as MOOT. 3. Respondent's Motion for an Enlargement of Time Within Which to File Response (Docket No. 52) is ALLOWED. 4. The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Docket No. 2) is DENIED. 5. A COA is DENIED for all claims.(Hohler, Daniel) |
Filing 50 Judge Mark L. Wolf: ORDER entered granting 46 Motion to Amend; denying 47 Motion to Stay (Hohler, Daniel) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Mandeville v. Thompson | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.