De Giovanni v. Jani-King International, Inc. et al
| Vincent De Giovanni |
| Jani-King International, Inc. and Jani-King Of Boston, Inc. |
| 1:2007cv10066 |
| January 12, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Middlesex |
| Reginald C. Lindsay |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
278
Judge Mark L. Wolf: ORDER entered. JUDGMENT Associated Cases: 1:07-cv-10066-MLW, 1:12-cv-12146-MLW(Hohler, Daniel)
|
|
Filing
266
Judge Mark L. Wolf: ORDER entered. (MacDonald, Gail)
|
|
Filing
255
Judge Mark L. Wolf: ENDORSED ORDER entered granting 246 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Nicholas D. Stellakis terminated. (MacDonald, Gail)
|
|
Filing
214
Chief Judge Mark L. Wolf: ORDER entered. re 212 MOTION for Reconsideration filed by Jani-King Of Boston, Inc., Jani-King, Inc.,, Jani-King International, Inc. It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. By August 3, 2012, the plaintiffs sh all file any opposition to the defendants' Motion for Reconsideration (Docket No. 212). 2. Any reply shall be filed by August 10, 2012. 3. The scheduling conference previously scheduled for August 6, 2012 is canceled. 4. By October 5, 2012, the parties shall report whether they have reached any agreement to resolve this case. 5. This case is otherwise STAYED in light of the parties' agreement to mediate.(Hohler, Daniel)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
