House of Clean et al v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co., Inc.
Plaintiff: House of Clean and 77 Main Street Properties, LLC
Defendant: St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co., Inc.
Case Number: 1:2007cv10839
Filed: May 2, 2007
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office: Boston Office
County: Essex
Presiding Judge: Nathaniel M. Gorton
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 1, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 134 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER "In accordance with the foregoing, plaintiff's motion to continue (Docket No. 132 ) is DENIED." (Duong, Diep)
May 27, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 131 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER "In accordance with the foregoing, 1) plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment (Docket No. 92 ) is, with respect to St. Paul's duty to defend within Count I, ALLOWE D, but in all other respects, DENIED; 2) defendant's motion for summary judgment (Docket No. 100 ) is, with respect to the duty to defend for all policy years and the duty to indemnify for the period between January 1, 1970 and January 1, 1973, DENIED, and, with respect to the duty to indemnify for the period between January 1, 1973 and January 1, 1981, ALLOWED; 3) defendant's motion to strike hearsay affidavits (DocketNo. 105 ) is ALLOWED; 4) defendant's motion to strike the su pplemental expert report of Ian Phillips (Docket No. 118 ) is, for the purposes of the Court's ruling on the summary judgment motions, ALLOWED, but in all other respects the motion is DENIED, without prejudice provided however that plaintiff makes Mr. Phillips available for a short, supplemental deposition at defendant's convenience and plaintiff's expense before Mr. Phillips testifies at the trial." (Duong, Diep)
April 5, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 97 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER "In accordance with the foregoing, plaintiff's motion to amend (Docket No. 84 ) is DENIED." (Duong, Diep)
April 2, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 65 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Granting in Part, Denying in Part 47 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 54 and 63 Cross Motions for Summary Judgment.(Johnson, Jay)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: House of Clean et al v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co., Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co., Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: House of Clean
Represented By: Robert A. Fasanella
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: 77 Main Street Properties, LLC
Represented By: David C. McSweeney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?