Nationwide Insurance Company v. Spinal Imaging, Inc. et al
| Nationwide Insurance Company |
| Spinal Imaging, Inc., Bruce Abelson, John R. Henry, Duane Marquart, Joseph L. Boyle, Lodes Chiropractic Center, P.A., Michael Lodes, First Diagnostic, Inc., Robert S. Weatherwax and Baynard Chiropractic Associates, P.A. |
| 1:2008cv11073 |
| June 25, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization Office |
| Bristol |
| Nancy Gertner |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 18:1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
230
Magistrate Judge Robert B. Collings: Final SCHEDULING ORDER entered. (Dolan, Kathleen)
|
|
Filing
191
Magistrate Judge Robert B. Collings: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT ABELSON'S MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF TO FURTHER [sic] RESPOND TO ABELSONS REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 37(a) AND LOCAL RULE 37.1 (#162) denying 162 Motion to Compel (Russo, Noreen)
|
|
Filing
111
Magistrate Judge Robert B. Collings: ORDER ON DEFENDANT SPINAL IMAGING, INC.'S MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER INTERROGATORY ANSWERS (#93); See Order attached granting in part and denying in part 93 Motion to Compel. (Dolan, Kathleen)
|
|
Filing
101
Magistrate Judge Robert B. Collings: PROCEDURAL ORDER ON DEFENDANT SPINAL IMAGING, INC.'S MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER INTERROGATORY ANSWERS (#93).(Dolan, Kathleen)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
