Riley v. Cohn Whitesell & Goldberg et al
Plaintiff: Lynne F. Riley
Defendant: Cohn Whitesell & Goldberg and Deepak S. Kulkarni
Case Number: 1:2008cv11102
Filed: June 27, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office: Bankruptcy Appeal (801) Office
County: Suffolk
Presiding Judge: George A. OToole
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Riley v. Cohn Whitesell & Goldberg et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lynne F. Riley
Represented By: Janet E. Bostwick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cohn Whitesell & Goldberg
Represented By: Nathan R. Soucy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Deepak S. Kulkarni
Represented By: Nathan R. Soucy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?