Plymouth Yongle Tape (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. v. Plymouth Rubber Co., Inc.
Plaintiff: Plymouth Yongle Tape (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
Defendant: Plymouth Rubber Co., Inc.
Case Number: 1:2008cv11599
Filed: September 18, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office: Contract: Other Office
County: XX Outside US
Presiding Judge: Mark L. Wolf
Nature of Suit: Both
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 60 Ch. Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein: MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER entered denying 55 Plymouth Rubber Company, LLC's Motion to Compel Arbitration. (Irwin, Nancy)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Plymouth Yongle Tape (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. v. Plymouth Rubber Co., Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Plymouth Yongle Tape (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
Represented By: Alan D. Rose, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Plymouth Rubber Co., Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?