Oak Knoll Health Care Center v. Leavitt
Plaintiff: Oak Knoll Health Care Center
Defendant: Michael Leavitt
Case Number: 1:2008cv12051
Filed: December 10, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office: Contract: Recovery Medicare Office
County: Middlesex
Presiding Judge: Nancy Gertner
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 42:1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 27 Judge Douglas P. Woodlock: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered adopting Report and Recommendations 25 and thereby denying 13 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 18 Motion for Order affirming Administrator. (Woodlock, Douglas)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Oak Knoll Health Care Center v. Leavitt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Oak Knoll Health Care Center
Represented By: Todd Lincoln Tisdale
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Leavitt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?