American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts v. Leavitt
| American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts |
| Michael O Leavitt, Daniel Schneider and David H Siegel |
| 1:2009cv10038 |
| January 12, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Suffolk |
| Richard G. Stearns |
| None |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
105
Judge Richard G. Stearns: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered. The ACLUs motion for summary judgment is ALLOWED. It is therefore ADJUDGED and DECLARED that the government defendants violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United St ates Constitution, insofar as they delegated authority to a religious organization to impose religiously based restrictions on the expenditure of taxpayer funds, and thereby impliedly endorsed the religious beliefs of the USCCB and the Catholic Church. The government defendants motion for summary judgment is DENIED. The USCCBs motion to dismiss and motion for summary are DENIED. (RGS, law2)
|
|
Filing
98
Judge Richard G. Stearns: MEMORANDUM and ORDER entered granting 51 Motion to Unseal Documents; denying 53 Motion to Seal Documents; denying 63 Motion to Seal; denying 83 Motion to Seal Document (RGS, law2)
|
|
Filing
31
Judge Richard G. Stearns: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered.(Tyler, Rebecca)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
