Goodwin v. British Airways PLC

Plaintiff: Henrietta Goodwin
Defendant: British Airways PLC
Case Number: 1:2009cv10463
Filed: March 26, 2009
Court: Massachusetts District Court
Office: Airplane Office
County: Middlesex
Presiding Judge: Mark L. Wolf
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 8, 2011 30 Opinion or Order of the Court Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler: ORDER entered. FINAL JUDGMENT The issues having been duly heard and a decision rendered by this court, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that plaintiff Henrietta Goodwin take nothing, that this action be dismissed on the merits, and that defendant British Airways PLC recover of plaintiff its costs under Rule 54(d)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P.(Feeney, Eileen)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Goodwin v. British Airways PLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Henrietta Goodwin
Represented By: James D. Gotz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: British Airways PLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?