Figureroa v. St. Amand
Petitioner: Severo Figureroa
Respondent: Peter St. Amand
Case Number: 1:2009cv10943
Filed: June 4, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office: Boston Office
County: Essex
Presiding Judge: Nathaniel M. Gorton
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 26, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 26 Judge Denise J. Casper: Memorandum and Order entered granting 24 Report and Recommendations. Figueroa's objections to the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Bowler are overruled and the report and recommendation is accepted by the Court. Accordingly, Figueroa's petition for habeas is DISMISSED (Hourihan, Lisa)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Figureroa v. St. Amand
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Severo Figureroa
Represented By: Edward J. O'Brien
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Peter St. Amand
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?